<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The new England</title>
	<link>http://sportolysis.blogsome.com/2005/07/15/the-new-england/</link>
	<description>A few wins, a few lessons. Never any losses.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: wer</title>
		<link>http://sportolysis.blogsome.com/2005/07/15/the-new-england/#comment-1118</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 03:02:05 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sportolysis.blogsome.com/2005/07/15/the-new-england/#comment-1118</guid>
					<description>Consumer and prescribing information.
Actonel with Calcium, Actoplus Met, Aczone, Angeliq, Arranon, Avandaryl, Estrogel, Exjade, Levemir, Hylenex, Increlex, Kepivance, Lyrica, Migraten, Nepafenac Ophthalmic, Nexavar, Orencia, Proquad, Relenza, Revlimid, Rozerem, Tamiflu, Vaprisol...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Consumer and prescribing information.<br />
Actonel with Calcium, Actoplus Met, Aczone, Angeliq, Arranon, Avandaryl, Estrogel, Exjade, Levemir, Hylenex, Increlex, Kepivance, Lyrica, Migraten, Nepafenac Ophthalmic, Nexavar, Orencia, Proquad, Relenza, Revlimid, Rozerem, Tamiflu, Vaprisol&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: testanchor129</title>
		<link>http://sportolysis.blogsome.com/2005/07/15/the-new-england/#comment-76</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 00:45:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sportolysis.blogsome.com/2005/07/15/the-new-england/#comment-76</guid>
					<description>testcomment364</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>testcomment364
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: akr</title>
		<link>http://sportolysis.blogsome.com/2005/07/15/the-new-england/#comment-25</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 06:51:18 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sportolysis.blogsome.com/2005/07/15/the-new-england/#comment-25</guid>
					<description>Either way, I hope that KP is given a fair run. There is no point in picking him at the atrt of the series if he igoing to be dropped at the first sign of inadequacy. One assumes the selectors have a certain amount of faith in him. Lets hope he justifies it, but if he does not- they should give him a bit of a chance before pressing the panic cutton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Either way, I hope that KP is given a fair run. There is no point in picking him at the atrt of the series if he igoing to be dropped at the first sign of inadequacy. One assumes the selectors have a certain amount of faith in him. Lets hope he justifies it, but if he does not- they should give him a bit of a chance before pressing the panic cutton.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ram</title>
		<link>http://sportolysis.blogsome.com/2005/07/15/the-new-england/#comment-21</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:24:35 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sportolysis.blogsome.com/2005/07/15/the-new-england/#comment-21</guid>
					<description>i think this pieterson and thorpe argument is degenerating into random thoughtlessness. Simple question - who is a better cricketer? Thorpe or KP. Methinks Thorpey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>i think this pieterson and thorpe argument is degenerating into random thoughtlessness. Simple question - who is a better cricketer? Thorpe or KP. Methinks Thorpey.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
