On Lee

July 25, 2005

Every one has an opinion on him. The opinions are in the extreme. Some wrote him off ages ago - rubished him for eternity. Some believe he has class to mark a decent test career. The Australian selectors and I are of the second category of people. Lee managed to make a come back thanks to the larger perspective of the Aussie selectors. Roebuck presents a superb assessment of Lee:

Not so long ago Lee was in such bad form that he could hardly release the ball. No one present during the Sydney Test match against India 18 months ago was confident of ever seeing him bowl for his country again. He was reduced to releasing the ball from a yard behind the popping crease and left nursing embarrassing figures. A bowler’s pain is public. Dismissed batsmen retreat to the rooms. It might have broken a lesser man.

Early in his career, Lee sampled the joys of the game as he cut a swathe through opponents like a latter-day Errol Flynn. Then came injuries and setbacks and losses of form that created confusion in an essentially relaxed brain. Sydney was the low point. It had looked like the end. In fact, it was just a beginning.

Lee could take consolation from the fact that he was still dangerous with the white ball. Indeed, he was the best bowler at the most recent World Cup. Armed with a white missile, he could bowl with pace and swing, a potent combination. His success in one-day cricket brought him the time that he needed to sort out the rest of his game.

Taken to India but not chosen for a single Test match, Lee dedicated himself to taking his fitness to an even higher level. That he lost weight on the tour was due not to Delhi belly but to his new physical discipline.

In Shane Watson he found a splendid partner in this endeavour. Every evening the pair flogged their bodies mercilessly in search of the strength and speed needed to give them an edge. Ever since, Lee has been superb in both forms of the game.

Naturally, it took time to convince the selectors that he was indeed a new man. Last autumn he toured New Zealand and again could not force his way into the team. He arrived in England as fourth seamer but bowled with such gusto that his candidacy had to be taken seriously, especially by a team lacking a cutting edge. Lee did not play at Lord’s because a colleague had lost form. He demanded a place with stirring performances.

Link courtesy: Mike on cricket

Another greatest debate

After Federer won his third consecutive Wimbledon the early whispers of comparing Sampras and Federer had already begun. Every one ofcourse forgot the great Rod Laver.

Now that Armstrong has retired, there are more greatest debates ensuing. How does Armstrong compare to the other sporting greats? Was he even the greatest cyclist ever to be worthy of comparison with the greatest of greats from other sports?

These exercises are futile because we can never compare eras. The parameters are too dynamic, very different between different eras. But the idea is so interesting, I guess such debates will never stop. Expect Schumacher to be in the mix of such debates once he hangs up his boots more than ever before. Then we will have a Lara vs Viv Richards comparison. Meanwhile Woods vs Nicholas will be a debate which may well go on 50 years or 100 years from now.

In the meanwhile, check out how the cycling great of our era at least has crossed the barriers of nations and religion, headlining in newspapers every where. Newsdesigner.com has composed some of the best front pages featuring Armstrong.

Link courtesy: www.tdfblog.com

Sportscenter India and other Sports news shows

I do not understand why a cricket legend like Wasim Akram has to be put into the role of Sports News Reader by ESPN on Spotscenter India. Asking cricketing gyan from an expert is good. Asking him to tell us the latest news is not only underutilising the expert, it is also misutilising him.

Also, I liked the earlier look of the show where 30 minutes of sports news, mainly India centred was presented in English. I would ideally like a 60 minute show, much like Sportcenter USA used to be (whatever I managed to watch while it was broadcast in India before it was stopped 3-4 years ago) but a 30 minute English show was not bad.

The current show in hindi is some thing I am put off with. Not because I am against regional languages. But alternate news shows in hindi was some thing which was a better option according to me. Right now Sportcenter is almost unwatchable. The news ticker which they introduced a few months ago in the English version was a novel addition, much like USA Fox’s Sportsline (which was similar to Sportcenter USA - a one hour show stopped in India a few years ago) but over all the show Sportenter India will be less watched by me, even though I rarely used to watch it, even in English.

CNN World Sport - the definitive 30 minute show on sports is what I call the complete Sports News Show.

Roebuck on Karachi

Peter Roebuck rights about there being no shame in losing to Australia but ads a statement quite out of place in an article on the Ashes:

They must play cricket in Karachi and anywhere else. The world has shrunk.

I have stated my views on England’s decision not to play in Karachi earlier but it is good to know that my favourite cricket writer shares the same view.